This program brings data, experience, and differing viewpoints into one conversation. Clinicians work through the real questions behind treatment choices, and each debate tests the evidence in clear, practical ways. Q and A and case discussion reveal where certainty holds and where judgment matters, giving you takeaways that fit directly into your daily practice.

Review the comparison below to see what makes OLN Great Debates in Solid Tumors a uniquely valuable forum for clinical decision making.

Key Features

OLN Great Debates in Solid Tumors

Compared to Other Oncology Meetings

Scope of Curriculum Covers five major tumor areas (breast, lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecologic cancers) providing a complete view of today’s solid tumor landscape. Typically limited to one tumor type or subspecialty, reducing cross-disciplinary learning.
Learning Format Built for dialogue and debate: dynamic point-counterpoint discussions, case-based exchanges, and interactive Q&A sessions that keep clinicians engaged. Predominantly lecture-driven with limited opportunity for peer discussion or exchange of differing perspectives.
Faculty Depth and Engagement Features 50+ experts who actively debate, challenge data, and connect with attendees throughout and beyond the event. Smaller, lecture-focused faculty groups; minimal real-time engagement with participants.
Educational Integration Backed by the Oncology Learning Network (OLN), which extends education year-round through articles, interviews, and case discussions. Standalone events without sustained educational or media integration.
Back to top